<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Standardizing Arguments, what fun!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://77viceversa.edublogs.org/2008/11/05/standardizing-arguments-what-fun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://77viceversa.edublogs.org/2008/11/05/standardizing-arguments-what-fun/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 23:44:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: peterrabbit</title>
		<link>http://77viceversa.edublogs.org/2008/11/05/standardizing-arguments-what-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>peterrabbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 23:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://77viceversa.edublogs.org/?p=79#comment-37</guid>
		<description>When I look at your standardizations I feel as though the second one is better. But the reason why I feel this way, I&#039;m not quite sure of. I don&#039;t want to say &quot;because it&#039;s longer&quot;, but it just seems to flow better than the first one.

I understand that your first editorial was really short and too the point, so it makes sense that your standardization would also be short and to the point. I&#039;m afraid I can&#039;t really help you since I&#039;m very confused as to whether or not I&#039;m doing my own right.

I guess my comment is...pick the second one?

I love you.
Stephanie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I look at your standardizations I feel as though the second one is better. But the reason why I feel this way, I&#8217;m not quite sure of. I don&#8217;t want to say &#8220;because it&#8217;s longer&#8221;, but it just seems to flow better than the first one.</p>
<p>I understand that your first editorial was really short and too the point, so it makes sense that your standardization would also be short and to the point. I&#8217;m afraid I can&#8217;t really help you since I&#8217;m very confused as to whether or not I&#8217;m doing my own right.</p>
<p>I guess my comment is&#8230;pick the second one?</p>
<p>I love you.<br />
Stephanie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
